Return to Home Page

News Release

Now More than Ever: The Importance of Getting the Best Price on Prescription Drugs

By State Senator Dede Feldman

(January, 2002) Declining state revenues and escalating Medicaid costs are in the news in New Mexico as 2002 state lawmakers grapple with a key problem: how to ensure basic health care for those who can least afford it, while slowing the financial hemorrhaging of both private and public health care programs. A look at the Byzantine world of prescription drugs, which the Health and Human Services Committee has been taking for two years now, gives us a peek at both the problem-- and the solution.

The cost of prescription drugs has been increasing 10-15% each year since 1995. The hike is three times the rate that other health care costs are rising. The cost increases have hit seniors and others without prescription drug coverage the hardest. Low-income seniors now pay one third of their income for health care, including prescriptions, doctor bills, and premiums, according to a study completed by Dr. Steven Crystal, of Rutgers University. And without some action from the state, the situation is going to get worse.
With the spiraling price of prescription drugs taking a bigger and bigger bite out of both consumer and state Medicaid budgets, now more than ever we need to be sure that we are getting the "best price" possible from drug companies for lifesaving drugs. But what is the best price? That’s a question even a college professor has trouble answering, given the tiered price structure and the dizzying array of discounts available to almost everyone—except, that is, seniors and people without insurance, who get hit with the highest possible price.

Under federal law, drug manufacturers sell the exact same pharmaceuticals to different purchasers at different prices. For example if the retail cost for a particular dosage and quantity of a brand name prescription drug is $100, Medicaid and large HMOs pay, on average $65; federally qualified health centers pay $54 (under the "340 B program"); the Department of Defense and Veterans Administration pay $46 or less. Un-insured residents pay the full, retail price.

The price differentials allow room for negotiation, but, for the most part, states and even the federal government have been no match for the drug companies. Even the recent negotiated price reduction for the anti-anthrax drug, Cipro, that Sec. Tommy Thompson won from Bayer Corp. (.95 a pill rather than the retail $4-5 a pill) was more than the .43 a tablet that hospital and clinics now pay for the same medication. And it is ten times what the pill sells for in India and other countries. To make matters worse—in a move that would make even the slickest car salesman blush-- the drug companies have done their utmost to shield the exact discounts and true price of these lifesaving drugs from public view.

Using the free market, New Mexico and other states, all of them huge purchasers of prescription drugs, can save millions by negotiating supplemental discounts from drug companies for their Medicaid programs, state employees, retirees, prisoners, and the uninsured-- who need help the most. For example, New Mexico could save as much as 17% in its fee-for-service Medicaid program if it went beyond the "Medicaid Best Price" to the lower price now paid by hospitals and clinics. And it could save millions more through better bulk purchasing, utilization of preferred drug lists and generics.

That’s precisely what the Health and Human Services Interim Committee is recommending this year through a bipartisan backed package of bills and memorials set for introduction in January (see below).
Several other state including Florida and Michigan, both led by Republican Governors, and pushed by fiscally strapped legislatures, are negotiating with drug companies for deeper discounts in return for inclusion of their products on preferred Medicaid drug lists. And the 31 states that already have pharmaceutical assistance programs for low-income seniors (New Mexico is not one of them) are striking harder bargains for their clients as well.

In every state where these efforts have been made, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PHARMA) has filed suit seeking to block price reductions. But they have not always been successful. And they will not deter legislators in states like hard- pressed New Mexico, where there are almost 500,000 people (approximately 70,000 of them seniors) are without prescription drug coverage.
Here are highlights from the package of bills and memorials the Health and Human Services Committee is introducing this year:

  • A bill to establish a senior pharmacy assistance program for low income seniors
  • A Fair Market Drug Pricing Act to provide broader Medicaid discounts
  • A bill to carefully manage a formulary for Medicaid permitting preferential listing of drugs based on the manufacturer’s voluntary agreement to provide greater discounts, and on better prescribing patterns
    Expansion of pharmacies at rural clinics to assist low-income patients in getting federally discounted or free drugs
  • A bill to require transparent pricing of pharmaceutical products in New Mexico
  • A memorial to request the Governor’s office to explore and participate in multi and intrastate bulk purchasing efforts
  • A memorial to study how to utilize the federal 340B program to maximize discounts
  • A memorial to request the NM Medical Society, the Pharmaceutical Association and the State Agency on
  • Aging develop a voluntary program for "brown bag assessments" and notification of generic and therapeutic alternatives to individual patients to bring down costs
  • A memorial to explore potential for reuses of unused, packaged prescription drugs from nursing homes
  • A memorial requesting pharmaceutical companies develop a simplified, uniform application for free drugs for indigent populations
  • A memorial requesting Congress establish one standard, uniform federal best price to eliminate disparities in discounts among federal purchasers

It will require a concerted effort to get these proposals through the process this year, although the need is even greater than before. If you support one or more of these measures, please call or write your legislator at 505-986-4300, starting Jan. 15, 2002. To keep tabs on these and other issues you can access the legislative web site at www.legis.state.nm.us. Better yet, make arrangements to visit Santa Fe and tell your story.
Sen. Dede Feldman is the Vice Chair of the Legislature’s Health and Human Services Committee


Home | About Me| Constituent Center| News & Views | Contact Me | Links & Resources